Finace

Finance Teams Were Running Workday Manually. Approvals Were Still Happening Over Email.

Regional bank and investment management firm, 9,400 employees across the US and Canada. Workday deployed for HCM, Payroll, and Procurement. Additional tools: SAP for general ledger, Coupa for indirect spend. ZipRPA used for payroll validation and automated audit trail generation; DAP used for Workday HCM and procurement workflows.

A regional bank and investment management firm with 9,400 employees across the US and Canada had Workday deployed for HCM, Payroll, and Procurement.

The organization also used SAP for the general ledger and Coupa for indirect spend.

ZipRPA was used for payroll validation and automated audit trail generation, while Ziplyne DAP supported Workday HCM and procurement workflows.

1. Context

The organization operated across the US and Canada with 9,400 employees.

Its enterprise technology landscape included:

  • Workday for HCM, Payroll, and Procurement
  • SAP for the general ledger
  • Coupa for indirect spend
  • ZipRPA for payroll validation and automated audit trail generation
  • Ziplyne DAP for Workday HCM and procurement workflows

2. The Problem

The organization was using Workday, but several critical processes still depended on manual work, email approvals, and post-process reviews.

Payroll exceptions remained high

Payroll exceptions averaged 310 per cycle.

Most exceptions were traced to:

  • Incorrect cost center assignments
  • Missing earnings codes
  • Override entries that were not reviewed before submission

Manager self-service adoption was low

Manager self-service adoption for compensation changes and performance reviews was only 31%.

As a result, HR business partners were manually processing more than 600 routine transactions every month.

New hire onboarding was taking too long

New hire onboarding in Workday HCM took an average of 22 days before employees completed all required profile and benefits steps independently.

Procurement requisitions contained incomplete data

Procurement requisitions in Workday had a 24% incomplete-data rate.

The most common issues were:

  • Incorrect supplier categories
  • Missing budget line references

Payroll regression testing was still manual

Payroll scenario test coverage was ad hoc.

Regression validation after Workday updates was completed manually, taking 3 to 4 days per cycle and frequently missing edge cases.

3. The Trigger Event

A quarterly payroll audit identified 47 transactions where manual overrides had not been reviewed against policy.

This resulted in a $280,000 reconciliation variance.

In response, the CFO issued a 90-day remediation mandate requiring:

  1. Documented process controls
  2. Automated validation across payroll workflows
  3. Improved visibility into exceptions
  4. A more reliable audit trail

4. What Changed with Ziplyne DAP

Ziplyne DAP was deployed inside Workday across three key workflow areas:

  • Manager self-service
  • New hire onboarding
  • Procurement requisitions

Manager self-service

Managers initiating compensation changes received inline prompts that validated:

  • Budget availability
  • Approval routing
  • Required information before submission

This helped prevent incomplete or incorrectly routed requests from moving forward.

New hire onboarding

New hire onboarding was rebuilt as a sequential guided checklist inside Workday.

Each step surfaced Ziplyne prompts explaining:

  • What was required
  • Why it was required
  • What the employee needed to complete next

Procurement requisitions

Procurement users received category-specific guidance while selecting supplier types.

This reduced free-text entry and helped users choose the correct supplier categories and budget references.

5. What Changed with ZipRPA

ZipRPA was deployed to automate payroll validation across 14 test scenarios.

These scenarios covered:

  • Gross-to-net calculations
  • Retroactive pay
  • Manual override compliance

Automated regression testing

Post-update regression testing was automated.

This reduced a manual process that previously took 3 to 4 days to under 4 hours.

Automated exception reporting

Exception reports were generated automatically after each payroll run.

Flagged transactions were categorized by error type, allowing teams to review and resolve issues immediately.

6. Results

The combined use of Ziplyne DAP and ZipRPA delivered measurable improvements across payroll, HR, onboarding, and procurement.

Payroll exceptions

  • Before: 310 exceptions per cycle
  • After: 148 exceptions per cycle
  • Impact: 52% reduction within 90 days

Manager self-service adoption

  • Before: 31%
  • After: 71%
  • Impact: 40 percentage-point increase in 3 months

New hire onboarding

  • Before: 22 days
  • After: 9 days

Procurement requisition accuracy

  • Before: 76%
  • After: 93%

Regression validation cycle

  • Before: 3 to 4 days
  • After: Under 4 hours per release

Payroll reconciliation variance

  • Before: $280,000
  • After: Under $18,000 per quarter

7. Stakeholder Quote

“We were catching payroll errors after the run completed. ZipRPA moved that validation upstream, and Ziplyne made sure managers stopped submitting changes without checking budget. The variance number told us everything we needed to know.”

— VP, HR Technology and Payroll Operations

8. Why It Worked

Payroll errors in Workday were concentrated at predictable steps, particularly:

  • Override entry
  • Cost center assignment

At those points, users had no real-time feedback.

Ziplyne DAP placed guidance directly inside the workflow, helping users enter the correct information before submission.

ZipRPA then validated the outcomes before they reached the ledger.

Together, Ziplyne DAP and ZipRPA closed a gap that manual review could not reliably cover at scale.